Pricing
IXSEO is a service rather than a platform, so there are no tiers, no seat counts and no features withheld behind an upgrade. There is a scope, a fee and a written statement of what is included.
Publishing a price for website assessment is difficult to do honestly. The same engagement on a twelve-page consultancy site and a twelve-thousand-page catalogue differ by an order of magnitude in effort, and a figure that covers both is either wrong for one or padded for the other.
So rather than a number that would be revised in nearly every conversation, this page sets out the packages, what determines cost, and what every proposal will state explicitly.
Packages
Most organisations begin with the free snapshot and, where it warrants it, move to a full assessment.
No charge
An automated public assessment using the same pipeline as every paid engagement. Real checks against your real website, not a preview with the substance removed.
Suits: Anyone wanting a fast, independent view of where a website stands.
From — fixed fee
A professionally reviewed audit for smaller websites, covering the search and technical foundations with prioritised findings and a conversation to work through them.
Suits: Sites under a few hundred pages where the question is what to fix first.
From — scoped fee
The full cross-module assessment with human review, competitor context, growth opportunities and a ninety-day roadmap. The engagement most organisations begin with.
Suits: Organisations where search matters commercially and a decision is pending.
From — fixed fee
A focused assessment of entity clarity, service definition, attribution, retrievability and external corroboration, with a plan ordered by dependency.
Suits: Organisations with sound search foundations asking a generative question.
From — fixed fee
A structured comparison against named competitors across coverage, positioning, structure and authority, with every gap categorised by whether it is closable.
Suits: Organisations planning where to invest, or wondering why somebody else keeps winning.
Custom proposal
For multiple sites, complex architectures, several territories or stakeholder groups who need different views of the same assessment.
Suits: Organisations whose scale makes a standard engagement the wrong shape.
Monthly — custom proposal
Ongoing strategy, implementation and reporting run as a continuing engagement, with somebody accountable for the work actually happening.
Suits: Organisations where capacity rather than knowledge is the binding constraint.
Where a full assessment is not warranted, we would rather say so than sell one. A client who was told they did not need the larger engagement tends to come back.
Cost
These are the variables that make a single published price impossible, and every one of them is discussed before a proposal is issued.
A twelve-page site and a large catalogue with faceted navigation are different exercises. Templates matter more than page counts, but both count.
Four modules or eleven. Email, DNS and exposure work adds specialist review and, where relevant, verification.
Whether we specify changes for your team to make, make them ourselves, or some combination of the two.
Whether a comparison is included, and how many competitors are assessed. Three is the usual and sensible number.
Multi-region sites add regional declaration review and duplicate work across each variant.
Whether the standard report suffices, or several stakeholder groups need different views of the same assessment.
Not sure which applies? Run a free snapshot first. It costs nothing and usually makes the right next step obvious.
The free snapshot is the same pipeline, on your real website, in about a minute. It is the cheapest way to find out whether a paid engagement is warranted.
