Skip to main content
Analyse

Ongoing

Continuing work, for organisations where search matters enough to keep at it

An audit tells you what is wrong. A strategy tells you what to do. Neither does the work, and for most organisations the constraint is not knowing — it is capacity.

Request a proposalSee how we work

Most organisations that commission an audit do not act on most of it. Not through indifference — the recommendations were sound and the people involved agreed with them. The work simply competed with everything else the marketing and development teams were responsible for, and lost.

A managed engagement exists to remove that failure mode. Somebody is accountable for the work happening, the sequence is decided in advance, and progress is reviewed against what was expected rather than against whether everyone was busy.

It is not for everyone. Organisations with a stable, well-performing site and no significant competitive pressure are usually better served by an annual review. This is for those where search and generative discovery represent a material share of enquiries, and where standing still means falling behind.

Scope

What a managed engagement covers

The proportions vary considerably by organisation and by period. A site with technical problems will spend its early months differently from one with sound foundations and thin content.

Strategy

  • Quarterly review of priorities against results
  • Sequencing decisions and their rationale
  • Competitive monitoring and response
  • Advance review of planned site changes

Technical

  • Ongoing monitoring of crawling, indexation and errors
  • Resolution of issues as they emerge
  • Performance work where it affects visibility
  • Pre-launch review of development changes

Content

  • Commissioning, briefing and editing
  • Revision of existing pages that underperform
  • Structural work on how content is organised
  • Removal or consolidation where that is the right answer

GEO

  • Entity and structured data maintenance
  • Consistency between the site and external sources
  • Attribution and expertise signals
  • Content structured for retrieval, not only for reading

Measurement

  • Monthly reporting on work, expectation and outcome
  • Quarterly assessment against strategy
  • Honest attribution, including where causation is unclear
  • Escalation when something is not working

Access

  • A named lead who knows the account
  • Availability for questions between reporting cycles
  • Review of proposals from other suppliers where useful
  • Input on decisions with search consequences

A good month may involve very little activity and a significant result. Activity is a cost, not a deliverable.

Rhythm

What a year tends to look like

Engagements follow a broadly consistent shape, though the timing shifts depending on what the initial assessment finds. The principle is that foundations come before amplification, because content published onto a site that cannot be crawled properly is effort spent on something that will not compound.

The first quarter is usually corrective. The second is usually constructive. By the third, there is enough evidence to know which assumptions held and which did not, and the plan is adjusted accordingly rather than followed out of commitment to the original document.

  1. Month one.Full assessment, baseline measurement, agreement on the first quarter’s priorities.
  2. Months two to three. Technical corrections and the highest-value structural fixes. Usually the least visible and most important period.
  3. Months four to six. Content and entity work on the foundations now in place. First readable movement in visibility.
  4. Months seven to nine. Consolidation of what worked, revision of what did not, and expansion into areas the early evidence supports.
  5. Months ten to twelve. Competitive response, deeper authority work, and an honest annual assessment of whether the engagement is earning its cost.

Comparison

Managed engagement against a one-off audit

Neither is better in the abstract. The right choice depends almost entirely on whether your organisation has the capacity to act on a report once it arrives.

Managed engagement compared with a one-off audit
 One-off auditManaged engagement
OutputA report and a set of recommendationsChanges made to the website
Accountability for deliveryYoursOurs, jointly with your team
Response to competitorsPoint-in-timeContinuous
Adjusting to resultsRequires a new engagementBuilt into the quarterly cycle
Cost profileSingle defined feeMonthly, proposal-based
Best suited toOrganisations with capable in-house deliveryOrganisations where capacity is the binding constraint

Frequently asked questions

What is the minimum sensible commitment?
Six months, and that is a genuine constraint rather than a commercial one. Changes made in month one are typically reassessed by search engines over the following weeks, and the effect on visibility becomes readable in the month after that. A three-month engagement ends roughly at the point where the first evidence arrives.
Do you implement, or only advise?
Both, and the balance is agreed at the outset. Where your development team is capable and available, we specify and they build, which is usually faster and always cheaper. Where they are neither, we implement directly. The failure mode we design against is a stream of recommendations that nobody has capacity to act on.
How does this differ from an agency retainer?
Principally in what is being bought. A conventional retainer buys a volume of activity — a number of articles, a number of links, a monthly report. This buys a decision about what should change and the work to change it, which in a good month may be very little activity and a significant result.
What do you report on?
What was done, what it was expected to achieve, what actually happened, and what that implies for the following period. Including where something did not work, which is more common than most reporting admits and considerably more informative than a chart of impressions.
Can we stop?
Yes, with notice, and the work done to that point remains yours. We do not build dependencies deliberately — no proprietary plugins holding your content, no tracking that stops working when the engagement does. Some clients move to a lighter quarterly arrangement once the substantial work is complete, which is often the right outcome.
Do you guarantee results?
No, and any provider who does is either misunderstanding the mechanism or misrepresenting it. Rankings are determined by third parties whose systems change without notice and who evaluate you against competitors who are also improving. We commit to method, judgement and honest reporting of what the evidence shows.

Related

PricingPricingHow engagements are structured and what determines cost.ServiceSEO StrategyThe strategic layer, available as a standalone engagement.MethodMethodologyHow assessments are conducted and what evidence they rest on.

Start with the assessment

Managed engagements begin with a full picture of where the site stands. The free snapshot is a reasonable first look at whether there is enough here to be worth a conversation.

Analyse your websiteRequest a proposal